diff options
author | Nikita Karetnikov <nikita@karetnikov.org> | 2013-04-05 23:08:44 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> | 2013-04-12 21:58:46 +0200 |
commit | 865c4ef33ce65ca87002a268230edae504c87166 (patch) | |
tree | 3cc21fbd18708aad97e1326d40fb38c08860a870 /gnu/packages/patches | |
parent | 3fdc99da1933e07985b6ca04d3b9412d5df05ade (diff) |
gnu: shishi: Update to 1.0.2.
* gnu/packages/shishi.scm (shishi): Update to 1.0.2.
* gnu/packages/patches/shishi-gets-undeclared.patch: Remove it.
* Makefile.am (dist_patch_DATA): Adjust accordingly.
Diffstat (limited to 'gnu/packages/patches')
-rw-r--r-- | gnu/packages/patches/shishi-gets-undeclared.patch | 71 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 71 deletions
diff --git a/gnu/packages/patches/shishi-gets-undeclared.patch b/gnu/packages/patches/shishi-gets-undeclared.patch deleted file mode 100644 index a3d6d0cca2..0000000000 --- a/gnu/packages/patches/shishi-gets-undeclared.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,71 +0,0 @@ -This patch is needed to allow builds with newer versions of -the GNU libc (2.16+). - - -commit 66712c23388e93e5c518ebc8515140fa0c807348 -Author: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> -Date: Thu Mar 29 13:30:41 2012 -0600 - - stdio: don't assume gets any more - - Gnulib intentionally does not have a gets module, and now that C11 - and glibc have dropped it, we should be more proactive about warning - any user on a platform that still has a declaration of this dangerous - interface. - - * m4/stdio_h.m4 (gl_STDIO_H, gl_STDIO_H_DEFAULTS): Drop gets - support. - * modules/stdio (Makefile.am): Likewise. - * lib/stdio-read.c (gets): Likewise. - * tests/test-stdio-c++.cc: Likewise. - * m4/warn-on-use.m4 (gl_WARN_ON_USE_PREPARE): Fix comment. - * lib/stdio.in.h (gets): Make warning occur in more places. - * doc/posix-functions/gets.texi (gets): Update documentation. - Reported by Christer Solskogen. - - Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> - -diff --git a/gl/stdio.in.h b/gl/stdio.in.h -index aa7b599..c377b6e 100644 ---- a/gl/stdio.in.h -+++ b/gl/stdio.in.h -@@ -698,22 +698,11 @@ _GL_WARN_ON_USE (getline, "getline is unportable - " - # endif - #endif - --#if @GNULIB_GETS@ --# if @REPLACE_STDIO_READ_FUNCS@ && @GNULIB_STDIO_H_NONBLOCKING@ --# if !(defined __cplusplus && defined GNULIB_NAMESPACE) --# undef gets --# define gets rpl_gets --# endif --_GL_FUNCDECL_RPL (gets, char *, (char *s) _GL_ARG_NONNULL ((1))); --_GL_CXXALIAS_RPL (gets, char *, (char *s)); --# else --_GL_CXXALIAS_SYS (gets, char *, (char *s)); --# undef gets --# endif --_GL_CXXALIASWARN (gets); - /* It is very rare that the developer ever has full control of stdin, -- so any use of gets warrants an unconditional warning. Assume it is -- always declared, since it is required by C89. */ -+ so any use of gets warrants an unconditional warning; besides, C11 -+ removed it. */ -+#undef gets -+#if HAVE_RAW_DECL_GETS - _GL_WARN_ON_USE (gets, "gets is a security hole - use fgets instead"); - #endif - -@@ -1053,9 +1042,9 @@ _GL_WARN_ON_USE (snprintf, "snprintf is unportable - " - # endif - #endif - --/* Some people would argue that sprintf should be handled like gets -- (for example, OpenBSD issues a link warning for both functions), -- since both can cause security holes due to buffer overruns. -+/* Some people would argue that all sprintf uses should be warned about -+ (for example, OpenBSD issues a link warning for it), -+ since it can cause security holes due to buffer overruns. - However, we believe that sprintf can be used safely, and is more - efficient than snprintf in those safe cases; and as proof of our - belief, we use sprintf in several gnulib modules. So this header |