diff options
| author | Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@debian.org> | 2019-09-23 12:46:15 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@debian.org> | 2019-09-23 13:01:36 -0700 |
| commit | 0def6a488cb70840f3bba6bd319be2af6f910582 (patch) | |
| tree | 453bb0da62fa0a68928748f0257b9fda0b684278 /gnu | |
| parent | 3defa90ddf949328a87645612956d991b9725fa4 (diff) | |
gnu: sbcl-cl-hooks: Fix typo.
* gnu/packages/lisp (sbcl-cl-hooks)[description]: Fix spelling of
"possibilities".
Diffstat (limited to 'gnu')
| -rw-r--r-- | gnu/packages/lisp.scm | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/gnu/packages/lisp.scm b/gnu/packages/lisp.scm index ee2d28e579..985ed45465 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/lisp.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/lisp.scm @@ -6833,7 +6833,7 @@ Emacs. In the Common LISP Object System (CLOS), a similar kind of extensibility is possible using the flexible multi-method dispatch mechanism. It may even seem -that the concept of hooks does not provide any benefits over the possibilites +that the concept of hooks does not provide any benefits over the possibilities of CLOS. However, there are some differences: @itemize |