diff options
author | Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> | 2020-09-23 10:29:09 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> | 2020-09-27 21:41:08 +0200 |
commit | 2bf6f962b91123b0474c0f7123cd17efe7f09a66 (patch) | |
tree | 21f74da9ad3b3eaacf91cd63302bea01f55bedb9 /guix/packages.scm | |
parent | ff39361c80dfc67a9afe35f315a774140d8cf99b (diff) |
packages: 'package-input-rewriting/spec' can rewrite implicit dependencies.
With this change, '--with-input', '--with-graft', etc. also apply to
implicit dependencies. Thus, it's now possible to do:
guix build python-itsdangerous --with-input=python-wrapper=python@2
or:
guix build hello --with-graft=glibc=glibc@2.29
Additionally, before, implicit inputs were not rewritten, which could
lead to duplicates in the output of 'bag-transitive-inputs' (packages
that are not 'eq?' but lead to the same derivation). This in turn would
lead to unnecessary rebuilds when using '--with-input' & co. This
change fixes it by ensuring even implicit inputs are rewritten.
Fixes <https://bugs.gnu.org/42156>.
* guix/packages.scm (package-input-rewriting/spec): Add #:deep?
defaulting to #true, and pass it to 'package-mapping'.
[replacement-property]: New variable.
[rewrite]: Check that property and set it on the result of PROC.
[cut?]: New procedure.
* tests/packages.scm ("package-input-rewriting/spec"): Ensure implicit
inputs were unchanged.
("package-input-rewriting/spec, partial match"): Pass #:deep? #f.
("package-input-rewriting/spec, deep")
("package-input-rewriting/spec, no duplicates"): New tests.
(package/inherit): Move before use.
* tests/guix-build.sh: Add tests.
* tests/scripts-build.scm ("options->transformation, with-graft"):
Compare dependencies by package name or derivation file name.
* doc/guix.texi (Defining Packages): Adjust accordingly.
Diffstat (limited to 'guix/packages.scm')
-rw-r--r-- | guix/packages.scm | 55 |
1 files changed, 35 insertions, 20 deletions
diff --git a/guix/packages.scm b/guix/packages.scm index 171fd048ef..f696945e30 100644 --- a/guix/packages.scm +++ b/guix/packages.scm @@ -422,6 +422,16 @@ name of its URI." package) 16))))) +(define-syntax-rule (package/inherit p overrides ...) + "Like (package (inherit P) OVERRIDES ...), except that the same +transformation is done to the package replacement, if any. P must be a bare +identifier, and will be bound to either P or its replacement when evaluating +OVERRIDES." + (let loop ((p p)) + (package (inherit p) + overrides ... + (replacement (and=> (package-replacement p) loop))))) + (define (package-upstream-name package) "Return the upstream name of PACKAGE, which could be different from the name it has in Guix." @@ -1051,12 +1061,12 @@ package and returns its new name after rewrite." (package-mapping rewrite (cut assq <> replacements))) -(define (package-input-rewriting/spec replacements) +(define* (package-input-rewriting/spec replacements #:key (deep? #t)) "Return a procedure that, given a package, applies the given REPLACEMENTS to -all the package graph (excluding implicit inputs). REPLACEMENTS is a list of -spec/procedures pair; each spec is a package specification such as \"gcc\" or -\"guile@2\", and each procedure takes a matching package and returns a -replacement for that package." +all the package graph, including implicit inputs unless DEEP? is false. +REPLACEMENTS is a list of spec/procedures pair; each spec is a package +specification such as \"gcc\" or \"guile@2\", and each procedure takes a +matching package and returns a replacement for that package." (define table (fold (lambda (replacement table) (match replacement @@ -1081,22 +1091,27 @@ replacement for that package." (package-name package) table)) - (define (rewrite package) - (match (find-replacement package) - (#f package) - (proc (proc package)))) - - (package-mapping rewrite find-replacement)) + (define replacement-property + (gensym " package-replacement")) -(define-syntax-rule (package/inherit p overrides ...) - "Like (package (inherit P) OVERRIDES ...), except that the same -transformation is done to the package replacement, if any. P must be a bare -identifier, and will be bound to either P or its replacement when evaluating -OVERRIDES." - (let loop ((p p)) - (package (inherit p) - overrides ... - (replacement (and=> (package-replacement p) loop))))) + (define (rewrite p) + (if (assq-ref (package-properties p) replacement-property) + p + (match (find-replacement p) + (#f p) + (proc + (let ((new (proc p))) + ;; Mark NEW as already processed. + (package/inherit new + (properties `((,replacement-property . #t) + ,@(package-properties new))))))))) + + (define (cut? p) + (or (assq-ref (package-properties p) replacement-property) + (find-replacement p))) + + (package-mapping rewrite cut? + #:deep? deep?)) ;;; |